Deepgrid Semi
DG32 · LOCKSTEP RISC-V MOTOR-CONTROL SILICONPRE-SILICON · ENGINEERING EVIDENCE
Request a discussion

D100 · 28 nm; 130 nm failsafe island Drone SoC

D100 is a 28 nm drone SoC with its own ₹50 Cr round, raised after mature-node revenue.

Illustration: the part’s blocks on its two dies. Pre-silicon; not a render of manufactured silicon.

Every figure on this page is a design target unless marked otherwise.

Navigation
Hardware VIO, six-DoF EKF at 30 Hz
Failsafe
Independent watchdog and safe-state machine, isolated power and clock, direct ESC link
Flight control
Lockstep DGridRiscV pair, hard real-time PX4 or ArduPilot, on a DO-254 path
Illustrative DeepGrid surveillance equipment and operator display
Defence and screened equipment. Existing DeepGrid application artwork · concept illustration, not a product photograph or deployment evidence. DeepGrid silicon remains pre-silicon.

D100 is a 28 nm drone SoC with its own ₹50 Cr round, raised after mature-node revenue.

D100 proposes an Indian flight-control and navigation chip, with a failsafe function that remains separate from higher-level computing.

Job
Separate flight safety from higher-level perception compute.
Replaces
Qualcomm’s QRB5165, the closest comparable chip, which is imported. Most chips in this class do AI or flight control, not both.
Status
Track B: funded by a separate round once the eleven mature-node chips earn revenue; its lockstep safety core is shared with SKU-4.

The business case for D100

The Blueprint places it outside the FY31 portfolio revenue plan and proposes a separate ₹50 Cr round after mature-node revenue.

What it replaces

Qualcomm’s QRB5165, the closest comparable chip, which is imported. Most chips in this class do AI or flight control, not both.

Customer opportunity

Indian drone makers, for defence and commercial airframes.

Policy and demand

No Indian chip combines flight control and visual navigation today, and country-of-origin rules bar components from land-border nations.

The delivery trade-off

Vision and AI need tens of millions of transistors within a drone’s power budget, which only a fine node such as 28 nm delivers. The failsafe island, which brings the drone home if the main computer fails, can be built at 130 nm, linking the two tracks.

Read D100 in the SKU Blueprint

What D100 claims, what it is worth, and what gates it.

The following mechanisms explain the proposed customer benefit. Each still needs to be validated in the complete product.

  1. D100 is a 28 nm drone SoC with its own ₹50 Cr round, raised after mature-node revenue.

    D100 proposes an Indian flight-control and navigation chip, with a failsafe function that remains separate from higher-level computing.

  2. D100 is funded after the eleven mature-node chips earn revenue.

    The Blueprint places it outside the FY31 portfolio revenue plan and proposes a separate ₹50 Cr round after mature-node revenue.

  3. 28 nm development cost and drone qualification set the D100 case.

    The advanced-process development cost and aviation qualification path remain major delivery gates.

Architecture targets, not datasheet values.

Every figure is a design target stated in the SKU Blueprint, page 43. None is a measurement of manufactured silicon.

  • 30 HzSix-DoF pose, in hardware
  • 10 TOPSOptional AI, phase 2
  • 1080p60Vision input
D100 system architecture diagram: flight control, visual-inertial odometry and a variant-2 AI die on a 128-bit AXI4 crossbar, the platform blocks, and a failsafe island with its own path to the ESCs
Detailed architecture and specifications
Process
28 nm for flight control, vision and AI; failsafe island buildable at 130 nm
Flight control
Lockstep DGridRiscV pair, hard real-time PX4 or ArduPilot, on a DO-254 path
Navigation
Hardware VIO, six-DoF EKF at 30 Hz
Vision input
MIPI CSI-2, two lanes, to 1080p60, with ISP
AI (phase 2)
Optional 10 TOPS INT8/INT4, 2 MB SRAM; attention and softmax in hardware, about 70% less power than a general AI accelerator
Failsafe
Independent watchdog and safe-state machine, isolated power and clock, direct ESC link
Memory
LPDDR4 32-bit, eMMC or NAND
Process
28 nm; 130 nm failsafe island
Maturity
Architecture scope
Designed toward
DO-254 · DGCA type certification path · STANAG 4586 · MIL-STD-810H
Source
SKU Blueprint, October 2026, page 43

Standards the architecture is designed toward. No DeepGrid part holds a certification or qualification today.

System architecture, signal flow and engineering references
D100 system architecture diagram: flight control, visual-inertial odometry and a variant-2 AI die on a 128-bit AXI4 crossbar, the platform blocks, and a failsafe island with its own path to the ESCs
  1. Marker ①: Sensors and the RC link reach two flight cores

    Flight control · hard real-time starts with IMU / MAG / BARO over three SPI links at 8 kHz, plus RC + telemetry over SBUS, CRSF or MAVLink. Both reach DGridRiscV × 2: one core for flight control and one for navigation, running the PX4 or ArduPilot loop in hard real time.

    Flight control · hard real-time

  2. Marker ②: Cameras feed a pose engine that needs no GPS

    In Visual-inertial odometry, frames enter MIPI CSI-2 on two lanes at up to 1080p60. The ISP rectifies them and corrects lens shading, and Feature extracts FAST corners with BRIEF descriptors, about 2k points per frame. The Pose engine is geometry, not learned perception, so it needs neither GPS nor trained weights.

    Visual-inertial odometry

  3. Marker ③: A 30 Hz pose reaches the flight loop over the crossbar

    The Pose engine fuses features with the IMU in an EKF with IMU pre-integration and sliding-window bundle adjustment, producing a six-degree-of-freedom pose at 30 Hz. It crosses the 128-bit AXI4 crossbar to the flight cores. In phase 2 the NPU, with attention and softmax in hardware, adds object detection on the same 28 nm chip.

    Visual-inertial odometryFlight control · hard real-timeAI · phase 2 · on the 28 nm chip

  4. Marker ④: In normal flight, motor commands leave on ESC OUT

    The flight loop combines attitude, pilot input and pose into motor commands. ESC OUT sends them as DShot600 on eight channels to the external ESCs and motors. This normal path depends on the flight cores running correctly, and that is exactly what the failsafe path does not assume.

    Flight control · hard real-time

  5. Marker ⑤: The link monitor trips the safe state in hardware

    The Failsafe island runs on isolated power and clock and watches from outside the mission stack. Its Link monitor detects RC loss, GPS loss or an IMU fault in hardware, not firmware. A trip drives the Safe-state FSM, which selects return to home or land, and the island keeps running when the flight software is what failed.

    Failsafe island · isolated power and clock

  6. Marker F: The independent path takes the ESCs on its own

    The Independent path drives the ESCs directly, bypassing the flight cores, the odometry and the AI. Recovery does not wait on the computer it is meant to rescue. This establishes a structure, not a result: the architecture does not establish jamming immunity or certified flight safety.

    Failsafe island · isolated power and clock

Numbered markers

  1. Marker ①: The IMU, magnetometer, barometer and RC link reach the flight cores.
  2. Marker ②: The cameras run through the ISP and the feature extractor to the pose engine.
  3. Marker ③: The 30 Hz pose reaches the flight loop over the crossbar.
  4. Marker ④: In normal flight, motor commands leave on ESC OUT.
  5. Marker ⑤: The link monitor trips the safe-state machine on RC loss, GPS loss or an IMU fault.
  6. Marker F: The independent path takes the ESCs directly, without the flight computer.

Block responsibilities

Flight control

A lockstep DGridRiscV pair, shared with SKU-4 and on a DO-254 certification path, runs the PX4 or ArduPilot loop. The IMU, magnetometer and barometer arrive over three SPI links; motor commands leave as DShot600 on eight channels.

Guide: Flight control
Visual-inertial odometry

Camera input enters over two-lane MIPI CSI-2 at up to 1080p60, passes the ISP and a FAST and BRIEF feature extractor, and the pose engine fuses it with the IMU into a 30 Hz six-degree-of-freedom pose.

Why The odometry is geometry, not learned perception, so estimating a pose needs neither GPS nor a trained model.

Guide: Visual-inertial odometry
AI, phase 2

An INT8 and INT4 NPU of about 10 TOPS class, with 2 MB of SRAM, runs object detection and segmentation for obstacle avoidance, with attention and softmax in hardware at about 70% less power than a general AI accelerator. It is part of the 28 nm chip.

Why Vision AI needs dense logic that 130 nm cannot supply, so it is a separate die the flight functions never depend on.

Guide: AI accelerator (variant 2)
AXI4 crossbar

A 128-bit crossbar joins the flight cores, the pose engine, the NPU and the platform blocks.

Guide: Architecture Overview
Failsafe island

A link monitor detects RC loss, GPS loss and IMU fault in hardware. It trips a safe-state machine that chooses return to home or land, and an independent path drives the ESCs directly.

Why Recovery has to work when the flight software is what failed, so it runs on isolated power and clock and bypasses the flight cores, the odometry and the AI.

Guide: Failsafe island
Platform

2 GB of LPDDR4, eMMC or NAND for logging, a five-domain PMU, secure boot, Ethernet and USB3 for payload and ground link, CAN-FD, SPI and I²C for gimbal and payload, and JTAG.

Guide: Platform
Prototype and product strip

An Artix-7 FPGA at 81.25 MHz validates the position engine; the product is a 28 nm chip, with the failsafe island buildable at 130 nm. FPGA timing closure is a prototype milestone, not a measurement of silicon.

Guide: Prototype and product

Primary sources

8 integration and validation references

Background reading explains the general technique each block uses. None of it describes this part or implies its certification.

Architecture from the SKU Blueprint, page 43. A functional view, not a floorplan.

7 questions D100 has to answer before it can be relied on.

The Blueprint’s design and status notes raise these. Each is a question silicon, test or layout has to answer before D100 can be relied on.

Recovery must work when the flight software has failed.Physics

A separate safe-state machine and link monitor in their own power and clock domain, wired directly to the ESCs.

Navigation without GPS.Physics

A hardware visual-inertial engine running a six-degree-of-freedom Kalman filter at 30 Hz.

Vision and AI need tens of millions of transistors inside a drone’s power budget.Physics

A fine node such as 28 nm for the main chip; the failsafe island needs no density and can be built at 130 nm, linking the two tracks.

Hardware failsafeOpen

Why is the safe-state logic separate hardware rather than a task in the flight stack, and what does it need to see to act?

GPS-denied driftOpen

Can the 30 Hz pose engine hold under 1% drift per kilometre under jamming, without learned weights?

Thermal envelopeOpen

How is heat removed in a closed fuselage at +55 °C with the camera pipeline and flight loops running?

Two nodes, one airframeOpen

If the failsafe island is built at 130 nm beside a 28 nm main chip, how is its independent power, clock and ESC path kept isolated across the package?

An architecture, with its evidence named.

Strongest evidence
FPGA-validated: the drone position engine runs as circuit code on the same Artix-7.
Development status
Track B: funded by a separate round once the eleven mature-node chips earn revenue; its lockstep safety core is shared with SKU-4.

The failsafe architecture does not establish jamming immunity, certified flight safety or an awarded silicon contract.

How every figure on this site was obtained

The systems it goes into, and the parts beside it.

Safe-state behavior, compute partition, power isolation and flight validation.

Parts beside it

Read the source behind every figure.

Each document opens inside the site at the cited section; the PDF is the edition of record.

Design files

Bring the socket. We will tell you what D100 has to prove for it.

Send the platform, voltage and power environment, interfaces and qualification needs. The reply names what is architecture, what is evidence and what would have to be tested.